After five years, the results will be reflected in nursing care fees.
This kind of debate has been going on for quite some time.
But by what criteria, and by what method?
Eating behavior also changes depending on the person’s mood.
Each level has different criteria for evaluating improvement.
After 5 years, it seems that we are waiting for an era when sensors and recording are automated and objectivity is guaranteed.
In medicine, there are similar debates forever.
It’s a bad surgery, and it takes a lot of time and effort, and the result income will be more.
Prompt and accurate treatment results in less medical fees.
Rehabilitation also gives higher scores for rapid initial rehabilitation to account for functional improvement outcomes.
In medical care and nursing care, results are not only visible results.
Unfortunately, there will be those who abuse this system.
Choose only early adopters who are easy to improve.
Collect only such patients and users.
Even now, there are hospital facilities that say so.
Evaluate good operators.
Eliminate bad operators.
The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare must be having a difficult time in designing the system.
Is it similar to sports rules?
It is correct to change the rules, eliminate wasteful finances, and shift the budget and points to pioneering medical care.
After all, there are cunning people who abuse any system or law.
Patients and users themselves should study as much as possible and make their own judgments.
But then, is it going to be a personal reward?
My argument has gone round and round
It seems to me that an objective, fair, performance-evaluating, reward system would be a perfect fit.
Even so, the fact that you have to aim for that is the difficult part of your country.
National price or free price?
It becomes a debate about the pros and cons of universal health insurance.
Pulse oximeter 97/98/98
Body temperature 36.2 Blood sugar 135
Deliver results
CEO Yasunari Koyama