As expected, the movie about the Tokyo Olympics movie has bad reviews.
There is almost no audience at the movie theater.
I think it was a mistake to choose a female director who is only famous for film festivals abroad.
After all, it seems to be a political choice to make the world championship a highly artistic movie, which can be seen as a manifestation of national power.
Olympic films are also required to be recorded as historical documentary films.
The director brings his own writing and artistry.
Perhaps, the steering committee of the nation should have had edit NHK recorded program into a movie version.
The 2020 version is a double version, A version and B version.
Follow the hardships of unnamed players and shoot behind the scenes of politicians and executive committees.
They show the director’s character, which is not completely straightforward.
By using the national budget this should not have been produced as an official documentary movie.
It’s the director’s personal original movie.
The director’s private novel work.
In every scene, I can hear the director’s self-assertion, screaming that it is their work.
It is a national expense and a tax, which is different from the purpose of the official record.
At the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, Yasunari was an elementary school student.
The official movie at that time was also controversial because the director, who was not interested in documentary films, said they would make a sports documentary film but shot a movie that they called highly artistic.
In the end, I remember it being re-edited after politician got angry.
A blockbuster movie needs a theme with a historical view.
My novel, which has only personal sensibilities, is different.
My novel would suit to be read alone in the library.
Watching a national movie in a big movie theater with a loud sound is another thing.
I wanted to watch a bold movie.
This morning’s pulse oximeter 98/98/99
Pre-meal blood glucose 222 Midnight somen noodles
Body temperature 36.6 degrees
Master representative Yasunari Koyama